| TABLE.1 - SUBMISSION PRESENTATION QUALITY SCORE INDICATORS |
Score Range |
What does it mean? |
Suggested Action |
| High Presentation Quality |
| 090-100 |
Highest Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically very correct. You do not need to make any further modifications unless requested by the preliminary jury. |
Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks. |
| 080-090 |
Very High Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically correct. Yet still, you might still want to improve the score for the best results. |
Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks. |
| 070-080 |
High Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically correct. Yet still, you should still improve the presentation score for better results. |
Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks. |
| Average Presentation Quality |
| 060-070 |
Above Average Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically acceptable. But it is suggested to improve it to get better results. |
Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks. |
| 050-060 |
Average Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically acceptable. But it is suggested to improve it to get better results. |
Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks. |
| 040-050 |
Below Average Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically acceptable. But it is highly suggested to improve the presentation. |
Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks. |
| Low Presentation Quality |
| 030-040 |
Low Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically incorrect. It is suggested to improve the presentation quality before moving forward. |
Fix the Warnings and Suggestions as indicated by the Optimizer. |
| 020-030 |
Very Low Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically incorrect.It is highly suggested to improve the presentation quality significantly before continuing. |
Fix the Warnings and Suggestions as indicated by the Optimizer. |
| 010-020 |
Ultra Low Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically incorrect. It is required to improve the presentation quality significantly for this particular submission. |
Fix the Warnings and Suggestions as indicated by the Optimizer. |
| 000-010 |
Lowest Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically non-existent. It is required to improve the presentation quality significantly for this particular submission. |
Complete your submission first by updating visuals and providing description before nomination. |
| TABLE.2 - SUBMISSION PRESENTATION QUALITY SCORE BREAKDOWN |
| Images - 57 points total |
| Main Image |
30 Points |
| Optional Images #1 |
5 Points |
| Optional Images #2 |
5 Points |
| Optional Images #3 |
5 Points |
| Optional Images #4 |
5 Points |
| Video File |
1 Point |
| PDF Presentation |
6 Points |
| |
|
| Descriptive Text - 33 points |
| Design Name |
2 Points |
| Function |
2 Points |
| Inspiration |
2 Points |
| Unique Properties / Project Description |
3 Points |
| Operation / Flow / Interaction |
2 Points |
| Project Duration and Location |
2 Points |
| External Link |
1 Point |
| Video Link |
1 Point |
| Public Link |
1 Point |
| Production / Realization Technology |
3 Points |
| Specifications / Dimensions / Package / Technical Properties |
3 Points |
| Tags |
3 Points |
| Research Abstract |
3 Points |
| Challenge |
3 Points |
| Team Members |
1 Point |
| |
|
| Bookpage & PR Summary - 5 points |
| Bookpage & PR Summary |
5 Points |
| |
|
| Client/Studio/Brand Details - 5 points |
| Relevancy |
1 Point |
| Name |
1 Point |
| Profile |
2 Points |
| Logo |
1 Point |
